New experience of a battle (better possibility)
H
heh133
Jul 27, 2026 · EN
63
14
7
Earned
1,373,852.97 IRR · the local value of 0.0001 gold from the author's country treasury for every read and every like
Hello and wishing health, peace and happiness to all the people of the world:
War between Ukraine and Russia
Yesterday I suddenly came across a red active battle sign. I opened it immediately and had not read anything about it before. At a glance I saw that about 3000 troops were on their way from Ukraine to Russia and Russia only had 500 defensive forces. I sent some of the troops to help Russia without knowing anything about the participation reward or the timing of the troops' arrival. I only realized that if Russia wins, my troops will stay there until the end of time and will not be able to return. Finally, I wanted to know how the battle would happen. A few hours later, the message of the new rule came and that your 2 troops that were moving slower had turned back. But in the real world, all kinds of troops move together in a camp by plane or ship or train or truck (or even horse-drawn cart) and reach the target at the same time! For example, suppose a country wants to conquer Greenland and I in Iran want to help Denmark keep that island independent, well there should be a difference between the forces that go there on foot or on horseback, by ship or by plane, this could be a good change and improvement.
Anyway, this was an interesting experience. But it feels like there are still many things missing. Like a battle simulator for an approximate assessment of conducting a battle or participating in it.
Also, if the power and effect of the forces that are more expensive and difficult to produce and use are greater in battles, it is better, for example, the power and ability of the elite forces should be greater than the defense forces because in addition to more cost and equipment, they also need a higher level of construction.
In addition, the style and type of military formation can also be important, and which part of the forces starts the conflict first. It would probably be more interesting if the location of the enemy camp and the camp of the allied armies were clearly indicated on the city map.
Also, a city with more police stations, fire stations, and hospitals should have more endurance and resistance to invasion and occupation. If it is possible to suddenly call and mobilize everyone in a city for defense, it will be very attractive and similar to the real world. For example, a citizen can choose to either lose 10 percent of his production or sacrifice a small part of his strength to resist and defend his friends.
If, in addition to the defense army for each city, which the citizen of that city pays for, it is also possible to form a national army, it would be great. That is, a national garrison managed by the leader or the Supreme Defense Council and all citizens help it either by sending financial donations and gold or by donating troops or raw materials to build an army and military equipment.
Another idea still seems to be more attractive, which will be said later. "Good luck"
